AI Existential Risks-The Subtlety of the Threat
- S Singh
- 12 minutes ago
- 2 min read
We've seen innovation and tech changes before—electricity to internet,but AI feels different. It doesn't just change what we do; it changes how we think. What happens when fake news looks just like the real thing? Or when entire industries transform because algorithms decide who gets hired or fired? What if only a few companies control the technology that shapes nearly every part of our lives?
The worst-case scenario isn't some sci-fi movie with robots suddenly taking over. It's much more subtle but a world where democracy slowly erodes under the weight of AI-driven inequality and confusion. The real danger lies in the small, everyday changes that add up over time. If we ignore those warning signs, we might wake up one day to a world that feels less fair, less honest, and less human.
But there are balanced perspectives worth considering. Oren Etzioni, a prominent AI researcher and former CEO of the Allen Institute for AI, is known for his skepticism regarding claims that artificial intelligence poses an existential crisis to humanity. Etzioni emphasizes that concerns about AI causing human extinction are speculative and may lack strong empirical support. He argues that discussions about existential AI risks should be grounded in observable data rather than hypothetical scenarios.
Etzioni often highlights the significant benefits AI can bring, such as reducing medical errors and accidents, and argues that focusing excessively on existential risks can distract from maximizing these positive outcomes. His view provides important counterbalance to more alarming narratives.
The challenge ahead isn't about fearing some distant future where machines rule the world. It's about keeping control over the technology we create today, so it helps rather than hurts us. That means thinking carefully about how AI is built and used right now—not just worrying about what might happen decades from now.
It doesn't have to go badly. But ensuring AI serves humanity's best interests requires attention, regulation, and thoughtful development focused on current realities rather than just speculative futures. The question isn't whether AI will change everything—it's whether we'll step up and shape those changes before any damage becomes permanent.

Comments